• Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard

Ex-deputy constable awarded $550K in harassment case - The Galveston County Daily News : Local News

December 20, 2014

Ex-deputy constable awarded $550K in harassment case

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

22 comments:

    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • bvresident posted at 9:44 pm on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    Is this you telling someone else to get a life?

    "Trina Evenhouse
    Aug 2, 2011
    UN agenda 21 coming to a city new you.. Alway implemented through Historical, Planning and Development, EPA, Green, Sustainable, Preservation. After implemented they will use your money paid to trustees to take your property....Democratic and UN control...Pay attention....(Houston Press)

    I suppose we all have something that gets under our skin. The beautiful thing about these forums Ms. Evenhouse is that reading them is entirely voluntary.

     
  • trinaevenhouse posted at 9:12 pm on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    trinaevenhouse Posts: 32

    Some people need to get a life.

     
  • bvresident posted at 4:06 pm on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    I've been squawking for a while that DA Jack Roady has two different sets of laws-one for you and me and one for elected officials and law enforcement. I think this case is another example of his bizarre idea of "doing what is right". She should have been investigated and charged back in 2011 and the taxpayers wouldn't have spent anywhere near $647,000. Thanks Jack, as usual you're doing a bang-up job of screwing the public.
    ChrisGimenez

     
  • Jbgood posted at 1:16 pm on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    Jbgood Posts: 2004

    Bvresident, you are right again. The jury spoke LOUD and CLEAR concerning this case. I think those who were responsible to stop adverse,negative behaviors in the workplace, and who knew about them, but did nothing about them, are just as guilty or more so than the perpetrators of the bad,adverse,and negative behaviors!
    -
    So, yes, steps should be taken to find out or to determine who knew what and when! Lets get to the root of the problem in order to ascertain some measure of assurance that what happened requiring the taxpayers to shell out over half a million dollars, WILL NOT LIKELY HAPPEN AGAIN for the same reason!
    -
    Who knew what, .....and when did they know it? Nobody enjoys shelling out taxes, but when those tax dollars are being flushed down the drain because of incompetence,.. or because jobs were not being done correctly,....then the public, or constituents of those involved should demand a formal investigation for accountability! A half-million dollars is a lot of money.
    -


     
  • bvresident posted at 12:42 pm on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    If there were some genuine journalistic curiosity at the GCDN they would find out who is responsible within the County offices for ignoring the complaints about Ms. Matranga so they could be held accountable if elected or terminated otherwise. Won't be holding my breath on that one. I guess it might cause some severe angst at the GCDN if they were to find out that responsibility for investigating her bad behavior actually landed at the door of the DA's Office.

     
  • miceal o'laochdha posted at 12:18 pm on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    miceal o'laochdha Posts: 566

    Very expensive Taco Del Pato if all of us are going to be paying for it. And, I guess we are...

     
  • bvresident posted at 8:58 am on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    It's being reported in the Chronicle that the jury awarded Mr. Gist. $200,000 MORE than what he was asking for. If true, it means the jury wanted to send the County a message about both Ms. Matranga's and the County official's conduct. A pretty strong message indeed.

     
  • Jbgood posted at 12:03 am on Sun, Mar 23, 2014.

    Jbgood Posts: 2004

    Taxpayers who pays! You knocked that one out the park!

     
  • bvresident posted at 9:30 pm on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    Well, you could be correct also but I think it's too small for them to take any more chances with by putting Ms. Matranga back on the stand. If it was in the seven figure range then maybe they go for an appeal. I wouldn't think they would take it out of someone's budget who had no responsibility for what the previous office-holder did.

    And it's not really the county's loss-it's the taxpayer's loss because some county officials neglected their duty to remedy the complaints about Ms. Matranga. I guess if it's not their money it's not a big deal.

     
  • justaman posted at 6:10 pm on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    justaman Posts: 194

    BV, Respectfully, We will know in a few days. You might be right and the county could accept the loss. Do you think it would come out of PCT 7 budget?

     
  • bvresident posted at 4:52 pm on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    Seriously, I think you're way wrong but we'll see. They can appeal it till Hades freezes over but they'll also be on the hook for interest accrual resulting in a bigger pot of money for Gist later. Kind of like a retirement plan being funded by the taxpayers as a result of the incompetence of County officials. Of course, no one is going to ever accuse County leaders of being uber intelligent. Otherwise they'd have corrected Ms. Matranga's conduct way back when. On a positive note, this should just about ensure the end of her law enforcement career in this county.

     
  • justaman posted at 4:37 pm on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    justaman Posts: 194

    Seriously, Mr Gist won't receive any money for a long time. The county will appeal this verdict. All he has is temporary bragging rights.

     
  • bvresident posted at 12:38 pm on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    Well let's just take a quick tally of the score as of now.

    Mr. Gist: still working in law enforcement & just proved his case before his peers resulting in significant award.
    Ms. Matranga: nada & nada

    It looks like the score is 2-zip in favor of Mr. Gist.

    Hey BTW, is Ron doing okay? He hasn't shown his face since his shellacking this week.

     
  • Jbgood posted at 11:34 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    Jbgood Posts: 2004

    I have not commented on this case up to now, and one reason why is I did not like some of the words used in describing what happened. However, there is right and wrong in everything, and right was not hard to see,...nor demonstrate in all this.
    -
    One of the things I live by is right reasoning, such as the ninth law of JBGism:
    9) You don't kill grass by mowing it,.....you kill grass by poisoning the roots! The reasoning is,... in any problem you go to the root of it to kill/solve what sustains the action! What sustained the unacceptable behavior claimed in this lawsuit? Who could have stopped it? So, who got sued?
    -
    That ninth law works for any problem, common or sophisticated. It would have worked in this case, if those who were ultimately responsible had taken the appropriate steps to shutdown the behavior in question. So the grass kept growing higher and higher.
    -
    "Workplace Harassment" is such a dirty phrase, and if you add sexual in front,...it then blows the scales of depravity in my opinion. I was not there, and so I don't know the particulars, but I do know this, the voice of the jury concerning this case spoke LOUD and CLEAR concerning behavior which should be allowed in and around the workplace. So, "somebody ought to be listening up."
    -
    I would also like to say this and then I will quit. Years ago, and even now the world is crying out for ground-breakers, pioneers who could and would bridged the valley of discrimination and opportunity between the few and the masses!
    -
    The world continues to cry out for an Arthur Ash,....Billie Jean King, Joe Louis, Rosa Parks, Amelia Earhart, Cynthia Lusignolo ( Superintendent Of TCISD ) Susanna Martinez.. ( Governor Of New Mexico ), and when such people seizes the opportunity to rise up from obscurity to build a bridge which alleviates or destroys the gaps of discrimination or inequality,..their deeds or accomplishments should not be undermined or diminished by scandal or incompetency. Either will have great consequences and repercussions on the chances others, like themselves, might obtain in the future to do the same things.
    -
    Lastly I must say again, what a great opportunity, which existed in all this, an opportunity to blaze a trail for others who feels undermined or deprived in America... to follow! Opportunities never knock,...they just appear,..for a certain period of time and wait to be recognized or taken advantage of before they move on! Many times........to never return again.

     
  • truthserum posted at 10:28 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    truthserum Posts: 525

    I guess Matranga will now be able to go after Gist since he now has a little money for recording her urinating in a bush while he was making derogatory comments about her and then posting it all over the Internet.

     
  • bvresident posted at 9:56 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    That's funny. I can hear Gist laughing all the way to the bank.

     
  • bvresident posted at 9:43 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    $97K in legal fees here and there, pretty soon you're talking about some real money.

     
  • justaman posted at 9:42 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    justaman Posts: 194

    550 know will buy Gist a lot of dresses too. Nice pretty ones..

     
  • Jeffs posted at 9:17 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    Jeffs Posts: 57

    I find it more amazing that Anthony Griffin won a case!

     
  • Robert Buckner posted at 8:38 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    Robert Buckner Posts: 739

    [beam]

     
  • Rockstrongo posted at 8:18 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    Rockstrongo Posts: 165

    $550K can buy a lot of "duck taco", if ya know what I mean. Wink, wink, nudge,nudge.[wink]

     
  • bvresident posted at 6:56 am on Sat, Mar 22, 2014.

    bvresident Posts: 1442

    "I think the trial is over and not in Gist's favor. If so, the daily news needs to do as prominent a story as today's , otherwise they may leave some undeserved lasting damage on Ms Matranga. In terms of doing the job of a constable, she was one of the better ones ever to have come along." (Ron Shelby)

    It appears courtroom analysis is not Mr. Shelby's strong suit. Those who excuse the kind of behavior exhibited by Ms. Matranga are the reason why this stuff continues in the workplace. Regardless of what they-or anyone else-deals with during their daily work, sexual harassment is not a valid excuse for relieving stress.

    Congratulations to Mr. Gist for having the fortitude to go through with the suit.