• Welcome!
    Logout|My Dashboard

Polls: Most in favor of League City dog park - The Galveston County Daily News : Local News

January 25, 2015

Polls: Most in favor of League City dog park

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.


    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • chuckd posted at 8:12 pm on Mon, Apr 28, 2014.

    chuckd Posts: 106

    optimistic1, I want to give you credit for understanding the tradeoff. The issue is one use of League City park fund money versus another use for parks. Too many (other) people forget municipal governance 101.

    A cat lover, I have no dog in this fight :-)

    --Chuck DiFalco

  • optimistic1 posted at 4:02 pm on Mon, Apr 28, 2014.

    optimistic1 Posts: 1

    I don't know of that many dog owners in LC, and I've been here for 30 years. I propose that instead, use this land and park fund for a fitness park for all citizens instead of a dog park for a few. Texas City has had this at their Nessler Park/Lowry Center since the '70's.
    "LifeTrail" fitness parks can be used by everyone from small children to the elderly. The equipment is simple, sturdy playground equipment, but made for exercising and workout. League City residents would probably welcome this a lot more than the dog park that has already been rejected by the voters.

  • mickphalen posted at 9:35 am on Mon, Apr 28, 2014.

    mickphalen Posts: 420

    The most representative, transparent Council ever.

    Councilman Mann: "I can’t remember the last time we asked for public input on anything" - - - that would be sometime before the 2012 election.

  • mickphalen posted at 9:29 am on Mon, Apr 28, 2014.

    mickphalen Posts: 420

    What a farce of a "scientific poll" - - - "We don't know how many people voted, or where they live, but 86% of them want a dog park" (12 divided by 14 equals 86%). But I will wager that 100% are dog owners.

    City Council and City staff should be ashamed at conducting, then publishing, such a lack of objectivity and transparency. Councilman Mann always demands that "the process" be followed ...maybe the "process" should include an element of fairness. Must be an election around the corner. What is the next special interest group that will demand "their share" from this Council?

    And a special thanks to Mr. Swerdlin and BARK9 (a pro-dog park advocacy group in Houston) for volunteering to help LC spend our money.

    There is no way this dog park will cost taxpayers "only" $200,000.