• Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard

Report: Seawall parking made $83K through February - The Galveston County Daily News : Local News

August 28, 2014

Report: Seawall parking made $83K through February

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

7 comments:

    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • IHOG posted at 11:45 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    Gecroix.
    You do have full command of our Coastal Texas dialect.
    Crotch holding and pigeon-toed puckered up crab walking couldn't be said better in english.

     
  • IHOG posted at 11:40 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    Net earnings?
    When will net earnings be enough to buy and intstal ONE Portland potty and clean it daily?
    Fees collected are not net earnongs. Operating costs must be subtracted.

     
  • gecroix posted at 7:34 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    gecroix Posts: 2892

    "The seawall parking program has generated more than $83,000 for the city since it began last summer, according to reports made by the state’s General Land Office.'
    This is great news. It means, or seems to mean, that every 6 months or so Galveston will make enough money off seawall parking to make a down payment on ONE of those west coast designer crappers, not including installation and maintenance fees.
    At that rate, there's still going to continue to be a lot of crotch holding and pigeon-toed puckered up crab walking for quite some time ahead...[wink]

     
  • Jake Buckner posted at 5:22 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    Jake Buckner Posts: 1502

    If what you say is true, and I have no reason to doubt you, it seems like the City needs a Metrics Department, whose job Is to gather data, analyze it, and turn it into management information.

     
  • isleshire posted at 1:51 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    isleshire Posts: 274

    Tragically the most frequent person to overestimate the value of the financial department in any government is the elected official. They simply do not understand that the finance department is not there for their management needs but for their financial reporting needs. And their financial reporting does not have any meaning for describing programs as functional or making money or just about anything else.

    The fines on parking tickets are City of Galveston dollars. The money paid into the parking system are governed by the rules of the GLO and are kept separate.

    I bet you the finance department is not keeping up with any distinction of collected parking fines that are generated from the Seawall parking. Just wouldn't occur to them. They are smart in other ways. Not real useful ways, but other ways.

     
  • John Ferguson posted at 1:45 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    John Ferguson Posts: 30 Staff

    Hi T,

    This report doesn't include fines, just the revenue from the Beach User Fee. Any revenue from enforcement goes into the city's general fund, which isn't as limiting on its spending restrictions.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the fines and tickets also decreased. The police department used fewer officers up there during Q2 and paid $14,000 less in wages because of it. But also, demonstrably fewer people park on Seawall between December and February. So what would be the cause of decreased citations? Fewer police or fewer people parking?

     
  • t14wagner posted at 11:31 am on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    t14wagner Posts: 24

    Nice report, John. And good to see we're turning a profit!

    Not sure you follow your stories as do other GDN reporters -- but if so...

    1) Are parking fines collected included in reported revenue?

    2) Expenses have trended downward. Do citations issued/fines collected trend similarly? Interested to know whether declining expenses have a cost of decreased enforcement.

    Unfortunately, the City remains tight-lipped on accounting details for a program implemented by public vote.

    Looking forward, with 3 qtrs of data in-hand, the City can provide financial outlooks that are much more accurate & reliable, than first envisioned. So, the likely question becomes, who at the City is accountable to answer:

    1) What is the comprehensive plan for providing SW amenities (it's been nearly a year and nothing other than piecemeal tidbits on a Loo purchase price, etc)?

    2) When will SW parking funds be adequate to fund proposed amenities?

    As someone who voted for paid parking, I remain interested to see if the City follows through with commitments made. And perhaps like most reasonable citizens, I am sympathetic that all foreseeable issues may not have been realized upfront.

    However, it's the manner the City deals with such challenges that has me concerned. Silence is often the sentinel of "we're spinning a story" to fit the outcome (e.g., added police presence is an amenity; parking to fund only the maintenance of amenities, as 7-figure grants are suddenly available, etc).

    A little transparency is precisely what this program needs, to sustain public support...IMO