• Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard

Runoffs for La Marque council, Galveston College board of regents - The Galveston County Daily News : Local News

August 30, 2014

Runoffs for La Marque council, Galveston College board of regents

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

16 comments:

    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • MissionaryMan posted at 9:04 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    MissionaryMan Posts: 1692

    "Of course, there's no photo ID on a mail in ballot"

    That right there is the problem....

     
  • carlosrponce posted at 6:42 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    carlosrponce Posts: 2036

    Hitchcock ISD suffered a great loss with the loss of Dianne James as a school Board Trustee. She had over 40 years of educational wisdom and knowledge with her. She had first hand knowledge of Hitchcock's extracurricular activities in cheerleadling, band,sports, etc. Her knowledge, skills and vision were clear assets for this community.

     
  • Miket55 posted at 6:12 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    Miket55 Posts: 35

    I refuse to get into an argument with anyone over this topic. I just thought maybe we could have a discussion/debate about the issues. I just wish the voters would see fit to keep Mr Osteen on council. Whether people realize it or not, his knowledge and keen eye is desperately needed. Now is not the time to change the bench. Again, just my opinion. Hope all have a good evening.

     
  • RonShelby posted at 4:11 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    RonShelby Posts: 477

    What???? No need to throw that around Robert. Its obvious what the problem was. Voter apathy and the absolute failure of candidates to actually go our an run for office. What a sad waste of election funds.

     
  • RonShelby posted at 4:08 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    RonShelby Posts: 477

    You can't help those who don't want to be helped by not voting.

     
  • RonShelby posted at 4:08 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    RonShelby Posts: 477

    There is voter fraud, but typically its not enough to truly impact a race....Unless you have 51 votes. Sad.

     
  • RonShelby posted at 4:07 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    RonShelby Posts: 477

    MissionaryMan, I want a change in that too, but its sad enough. If only 51 people voted? Anyone in LMISD screwed up. How easy to change a win of three votes. Now your stuck with it. Next time they need to call some friends to vote.

     
  • Robert Buckner posted at 4:00 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    Robert Buckner Posts: 679

    So what if Cleat paid for the signs. It doesn't make the candidate a puppet An adjective is a descriptive term, so you described her as a puppet? If as you suggested in another thread that Ms Bethea throw her support to Mr. Osteen, would that make Mr. Osteen the PD's puppet? Cleat's donations would be supporting him in that case along with the PD's endorsement. Whether you called her a puppet or simply referred to her as a puppet is a non factor. You have not proven anybody being a puppet as of yet and I doubt you ever will.

     
  • gecroix posted at 3:30 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    gecroix Posts: 2922

    Time changes a lot of things.
    34 years ago I was pretty unhappy with a guy on roller skates and wearing an orange ski mask, and now I was pulling for him.
    [beam][beam][beam][beam]

     
  • gecroix posted at 3:26 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    gecroix Posts: 2922

    There's no reason to suspect voter fraud because, as we all know, there's no such thing as voter fraud, and any claims of such are just a conservative plot to disenfranchise protected class voters.
    Of course, there's no photo ID on a mail in ballot...

     
  • Miket55 posted at 2:50 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    Miket55 Posts: 35

    Robert,
    I am not one to go by hearsay and rumors. And I don't know what you are referring to by Friday morning coffee chit chat. I only go by first hand account of events. Oh, on Ms Bethea's signs, they stated the signs were paid for by Cleat. Need I say more? But you are correct, I do back my candidate by their qualifications. I just did not see where the 2 new runners had any. And puppet was not name calling, it was used as an adjective. That again is just my opinion. You are welcome to yours.

     
  • Robert Buckner posted at 12:09 pm on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    Robert Buckner Posts: 679

    Only if you can prove it Mike. Now tell us how any of the candidates were "puppets" for the Police dept. How can you prove that? Hearsay and rumors aren't proof and neither is Friday morning coffee chit chat. My point is back your candidate of choice based on that candidate's merits and qualifications. An endorsement by an organization is just that an endorsement. Name calling is just a desperate attempt to discredit someone else and doesn't promote your choice of candidate honestly.

     
  • Miket55 posted at 11:22 am on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    Miket55 Posts: 35

    Can it be considered mudslinging if only facts were stated?

     
  • MissionaryMan posted at 8:53 am on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    MissionaryMan Posts: 1692

    Robert, I'll just say that the county should review carefully the mail in ballots of both elections and leave it at that.

    At the end of the day though, the voters of LM will have to decide if they want a candidate for city council with a proven track record who understands city government, budget, finance and the responsibility of protecting taxpayers money or do they want a candidate who lives with their parents, doesn't work and doesn't pay city taxes themself? Nothing personally against Mr. Lane by any means, but I peronally don't believe he is prepared yet enough for the challenges of this position.

    Now for the school district, well the voter apathy that you mention is quite obvious. The people of Annie's district just proved that they are more concerned about taking care of their friends and being "sheeples" to the so-called reverands further proving that they could care less about the children or our school district.

    As I said before, the county needs to go through all of LM's mail in ballots very carefully in order to rule out any possible wrong doing....[wink]

     
  • Robert Buckner posted at 7:19 am on Sun, May 11, 2014.

    Robert Buckner Posts: 679

    I could n't suggest any illegal balloting here in these two races MM but there's certainly a sure sign of voter apathy. It seems that very few cared enough to vote and many of those that did bother to vote were not as approving as you were for Osteen. Regardless of how the runoff comes out, I thank them for running a clean race and not having to resort to mudslinging as some of their supporters did.

     
  • MissionaryMan posted at 11:31 pm on Sat, May 10, 2014.

    MissionaryMan Posts: 1692

    I sure hope that Jim Malm asks the county for a recount of the votes from the LMISD election, especially all of the mail in ballots that were received.

    And while the county is looking at LMISD's mail in ballots, they might do well to also look just as closely at the mail in ballots for District B's city council race....