• Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard

Voter ID rules working fine, clerk says - The Galveston County Daily News : Local News

October 25, 2014

Voter ID rules working fine, clerk says

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

15 comments:

    You must be a subscribed user to comment on this story.

  • sverige1 posted at 1:51 pm on Mon, Nov 4, 2013.

    sverige1 Posts: 3623

    Jim Wright (a presumeably wealthy man with resources) had difficulty updating his voter ID eligbility. If a wealthy, educated person - who has someone to drive him to the ID places - if he has trouble getting the "OK" to vote, think of the thousands of immobile/elderly/poor citizens who are in the same quandry.

     
  • kevjlang posted at 4:18 pm on Sun, Nov 3, 2013.

    kevjlang Posts: 3010

    How about we put everyone in front of the gecroix & IHOG citizenship panel? Seems you two have a better idea of who should be voting than even Perry does.

    :-)

     
  • gecroix posted at 9:26 pm on Sat, Nov 2, 2013.

    gecroix Posts: 3000

    No no no no.
    Here's a clue: The Constitution does NOT guarantee people will not be inconvenienced.
    Now, read the nice lady who posted at 11:47 this morning for a real world resolution to the horrible, insurmountable, TERRIBLE 'disenfranchisement' problem that comes with voter ID.
    Somehow, she managed to vote in spite of so many claiming it too 'cumbersome'.

     
  • kevjlang posted at 8:48 pm on Sat, Nov 2, 2013.

    kevjlang Posts: 3010

    Then, quit saying that people that do have significant issues with obtaining the ID cards as lazy, undeserving, or playing to the progressive victim mentality. If the process is more cumbersome for someone than it is for you or me, I think we should look into it and try finding a reasonable solution.

    I certainly don't believe there's an intended census group of otherwise legal voters that may be inconvenienced, but that doesn't mean that there aren't issues.

    Your last two paragraphs appear to be addressed to someone else. My position is that you can't pretend that there aren't people out there that may be unduly inconvenienced just so you don't have study it and figure out how to address the issues.

     
  • gecroix posted at 1:29 pm on Sat, Nov 2, 2013.

    gecroix Posts: 3000

    No no no no. I'd very much like to weed out the phonies. In fact, many of them essentially having stolen from taxpayers, I'd like to put those people guilty of such in jail for a while.
    PART of the weeding out of the phonies is Voter ID. No jail time involved, but may well prevent the election of idiots who SHOULD be in jail...
    Difference is, some of us are willing to start somewhere, while others are content to never get beyond status quo. And we don't assume people are as dumb or helpless as our 'progressive' fellow citizens do.
    Why not show a little faith in your fellow man to stand on his own two feet when possible, rather than try to make him lean on your shoulder when not necessary?
    I've never understood why liberals and 'progressives' hate and demean poor people so much. Always wanting to keep them poor and dependent, and assume they need help with everything.
    Shameful to treat other humans that way...

     
  • bbock posted at 11:47 am on Sat, Nov 2, 2013.

    bbock Posts: 8

    I voted yesterday & yes, my middle name vs maiden name was in conflict with the computer records. In the time it took to print the voter bar code, the form was completed by the volunteer. No big deal - no hassle - no problem. Good job by Galveston County. Now its up to registered voters to just VOTE !!!

     
  • kevjlang posted at 10:55 am on Sat, Nov 2, 2013.

    kevjlang Posts: 3010

    And, your choice is to ignore the real victims because you don't want to go through the effort of weeding out the phonies.

     
  • gecroix posted at 10:12 pm on Fri, Nov 1, 2013.

    gecroix Posts: 3000

    Prove NOT exclusionary?
    Horsestuff...
    That's just a 'progressive' take on the old 'have you stopped beating your wife' dodge. That boy has cried wolf one too many times...
    How about a demonstration of a bit of 'inclusionary' participation in the process of good citizenship. LEGAL good citizenship, that is.
    Nobody worth knowing pays any attention anymore to bogus 'racist' or 'exclusionary' tags or any other label seeking to damn the messenger when the message he's delivering is unpopular.
    Pretending to be a victim whenever it's convenient demeans REAL victims of REAL injustice.

     
  • kevjlang posted at 9:07 pm on Fri, Nov 1, 2013.

    kevjlang Posts: 3010

    If it wasn't for the fact that I fly a fair amount, I could count on one hand the number of times I have to pull out my driver's license in a six month period. And I participate in quite a few personal activities. I don't know what personal activities you participate in, but I'd have to say that your statement needs some clarification to pass the smell test. Either that, or I'm missing out on A LOT of personal activities.

    You know, if it were MY idea, and I wanted to prove I'm not exclusionary, I would make sure that that the people most affected got to the DPS with the right paperwork.

    Overall, I'd say that the number of people truly impacted by voter id rules is pretty small. If voter turnout amongst women and minorities has increased, I'd say that voter id is immaterial. I know NO ONE that has said that they'd vote, except for the fact that no one was checking IDs.

     
  • gecroix posted at 8:51 pm on Fri, Nov 1, 2013.

    gecroix Posts: 3000

    If we are to believe the statements made in the article , which show unusual candor considering the subject matter, for which the speaker is to be congratulated, I'd have to say it's supportive of positions taken by some of us herein. Namely, that 'disenfranchisement' is a blame game used to cover for lack of involvement and/or action when personal effort is required.
    My Great Aunt Nancy used to call that one word...'jussplainlazy'.
    She may have been oversimplifying a bit...and of course one size never fits all...[beam]

     
  • IHOG posted at 7:44 pm on Fri, Nov 1, 2013.

    IHOG Posts: 2486

    If Democrats think their voters are too lazy or stupid to get a free photo ID why don't they get it for them?
    They rent busses and vans to haul their voters from the projects to polling places. Is it too much to use those busses and vans tp take their "hermit" voters to DPS stations.
    I say hermit voters because nearly all personal activites require an ID.
    Could be some of those voters don't qualify for an ID or voting?
    How did they register to vote in the first place?

    If voter ID was supposed to repress turnout it didn't work
    Other states with voter ID report women and minority turnout has increased.

     
  • MissionaryMan posted at 12:33 pm on Thu, Oct 31, 2013.

    MissionaryMan Posts: 1783

    I agree with all previous posts!

    This statement made by Mr. Miller is simply grasping for straws in order to avoid the new state law:

    "And if they have a bad experience, they go home and tell their family and their friends and soon word spreads and there’s a bunch of people who don’t want the hassle to vote,” Miller said".

    I think if I honestly felt that someone was trying to keep me from voting, I'd do everything in my power to make sure that I did no matter what extreme that I might have to go through.

    Mr. Miller should really try to come up with a better excuse in the future if he really wants anyone to buy into his credibility. [wink]

     
  • gecroix posted at 11:09 am on Thu, Oct 31, 2013.

    gecroix Posts: 3000

    “It’s hard enough for minorities to get off their butts and go vote,” Miller said. “If they run into a problem, they just give up.”
    WOW!!!!
    What a thing to say by someone supposedly an advocate.
    I would ask Miller if he's given any thought to who's fault that would be, if true?

     
  • confusedemmy posted at 8:34 am on Thu, Oct 31, 2013.

    confusedemmy Posts: 251

    Well, I'm not necessarily for Voter ID laws, but Mr. Miller seems to shoot himself in the foot with his comments.

     
  • carlosrponce posted at 8:12 am on Thu, Oct 31, 2013.

    carlosrponce Posts: 2579

    David Miller as president of the Galveston NAACP should help those without a photo ID get one if he feels there is a problem and especially if they are his relatives. As I posted earlier in response to a letter to the editor: to vote in the state of Texas you need to be a registered voter. According to Texas attorney General Greg Abbott "Just giving to the Texas Department of Public Safety your voter registration card is enough for you to be able to get the photo ID. So it'll cost you nothing, and the state of Texas will give it to you for free. If you don't have a photo ID on the day of the election, you cast what's called a provisional ballot, and you can even go get the photo ID after the election takes place. That's how easy it is. And so there's no excuse." As the article states the Voter ID Law is working in Galveston County.